Joe wasn’t sure. The words didn’t
mean anything to him, but his knees were getting sore. The idea of crawling
backward to the outside didn’t appeal to him either. So he thought, “I’ll just
lay down for a while.” I think you can guess what happened next: he fell
asleep. The next thing he remembered was waking up to a voice. It was a voice
he recognized. Joe looked up and saw that the right door was opened, and
Philo’s head was sticking out through the opening.
“Hey, Joe! Your snoring is really
loud. Why don’t you wake up?”
“I am awake,” Joe replied, “hey!
How’d you get in here? Well, never mind, I’m awake.”
“Are you sure about that? I mean
there are people asleep who don’t really know it. You know, like that little
kid in the movie. ‘I see sleeping people…All the time.’
“Yeah, I saw that movie. I don’t
get it. Besides that’s not what he said. The little kid said, ‘I see dead
people. All the time.’”
“Sleeping people. Dead people,” the
old man shrugged. “Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference. So, Joe, what
are you going to do?”
“I don’t know. It’s kind of blind
chance isn’t it? I might as well flip a coin. It’s just a leap in the dark.”
“Not at all, Joe. Listen; do you
know what the words mean on these doors?”
“No,” Joe answered.
“Psalms are books in the Bible. You
have heard of the Bible?”
“Who hasn’t? What do they say?”
“The one on the left, Psalm 14:1
says, ‘The fool says in his heart there is no God.’”
“Okay.”
“And the one on the right, Psalm
19:1” the old man continued, “says, ‘The heavens declare the glory of God; the
skies proclaim the work of his hands.’”
Joe thought about that for a
moment, and then he asked, “So, are you saying that I have to choose between
believing in God or being an atheist just to get down off this mountain?”
“You could look at it that way,”
Philo explained, “but let me offer you another perspective. The two doors, the
two thoughts in the Bible, represent two versions of reality. In one reality
there is no creator and all life is the result of blind chance. In the other
reality there is an intelligent creator who, in his infinite wisdom, brought us
into existence. Both versions have profound implications.”
“I
suppose that that must be true,” Joe responded, “but it sounds risky.”
“Risk!
Joe, think about it. This is not some “Lady-or-the-Tiger” riddle! The two doors
aren’t some kind of puzzle. We’re talking about the nature of reality. In one
reality we are here by chance. In the other we are here by design.”
“How then do you know which one to
choose? I mean, if there is a God, why is he so secretive? Why doesn’t he just
step out and introduce himself to us?”
“Oh,
but he has, Joe! He has! I mean, what’s harder to believe, that the universe
caused its own existence, or that God caused it?”
“I didn’t think about it at all, to
be honest.”
“Okay, but think about it now,
which seems more plausible?”
Joe turned that over in his mind
for a while, but eventually he realized he was just putting off the inevitable.
“Yes. It doesn’t seem plausible that something-anything-could cause its own existence.”
“That’s right Joey, boy! You get to
go to the bonus round. Let’s move this thought a step further. When you were in
school, did you ever see one of those little models of the solar system? You
know, the sun is in the middle and all the planets move around it, and all the
moons move around their planets?”
“Sure.”
“Well, let’s say you were out
walking in the woods and you saw one of those sitting on a log, or a rock.
Would you think it was manmade or that it ‘just happened’?”
“Nobody would be foolish enough to
think it just happened,” Joe responded.
“Exactly! So why would anyone be
foolish enough to think that the reality from which the model was made, which
is infinitely larger and more complex, just happened? Wouldn’t that person be a
fool? Isn’t that what Psalm 14 said? ‘The fool says in his heart there is no
God.’”
They were silent for a few minutes.
Then Philo asked: “Do you believe in the Big Bang, Joe?”
“Doesn’t everybody?”
“Wouldn’t the Big Bang imply that
the universe had a beginning? Think of it this way: the universe is expanding.
If we could rewind the tape, so to speak, the universe would be contracting to
a point. Wouldn’t that indicate that there was a point when it was not
expanding? Wouldn’t that have to mean the universe had a beginning?”
“I suppose that must be true,” Joe
said, “but I’ve never really thought about it that much.”
“That’s okay, but think about this
for a sec. Everything that begins to exist has to have a cause. If the universe
began to exist, then the universe has a cause. In other words, it didn’t cause
itself to exist.”
“Alright, Philo, let me think about
it.” Joe was silent for quite a while, then he said, “I will accept that the
universe has a cause, but how do you know there aren’t just an infinite number
of causes going back through time?”
“Ah, good question, Joe. But an
actual infinite number is impossible. It’s absurd.”
“Really? How so?”
“Let me use an illustration called
Hilbert’s Hotel. Some math geek thought this up, but it’s pretty cool. Let’s
say you had a hotel with an infinite number of rooms and all the rooms are
full.”
“Okay.”
“Now suppose a new guest arrives
and asks for a room. The proprietor says ‘sure’ and he calls up to the rooms
and asks the person in room #1 to move to #2, the person in room #2 to move to
three, and so on to infinity. He now has an empty room and the new guest can
check in. You with me so far, Joe?”
“I think so,” Joe replied.
“Okay. Now, the new guest checks
in. Are there more people in the hotel now than before the new guest checked
in?”
“Uh, yes?”
“No, Joe. There are still an
infinite number of people in the hotel. It wouldn’t matter how many people
checked in or out, the rooms would always be full. Infinity plus one is still
infinity. So an infinite works fine in math theory, but it can’t exist in
reality.”
“Alright, I get that, but how does
that apply to the universe?”
“Think of the rooms in the hotel as
moments in time, say years. You can’t have an infinite number of years in time
past. It’s impossible.”
There was a long silence while Joe
thought about this. After a couple of minutes he said, “Okay, so maybe there is
a god of some kind out there. That doesn’t mean “God” is a person does it?
Couldn’t the universe have come into being by some Force?”
“Another good question, Joe. But
would you agree that no effect can be greater than its cause?
“Maybe.”
“Bear with me for a moment, Joe.
Suppose that’s true. That would mean that we can’t be greater than the One who
caused us. So if we have personality, intelligence, reason, and such, then the
Creator must have those qualities to an infinite degree. He can’t be just a
Force. He possesses self-identity, self-awareness and individuality.
“There is plenty of evidence that
there is a God, Joe. People aren’t atheists because there is no evidence; they
just don’t want to believe the evidence that is right there in front of them!
Goodbye, Joe.” With that he shut the door and the tunnel was quiet again.
Joe turned off his flashlight to save the batteries,
and lay in the dark. So what about this God stuff? He had never thought of
himself as an atheist, but then he wasn’t a religious person either. He didn’t
pray, or worship, or read the holy writings of some group. He hadn’t really
thought about it at all. But what Philo said sounded reasonable. More than
that, it sounded true. Plus, he couldn’t imagine actually choosing to be an
atheist. No, that would never do. Joe turned on his light and opened the door
on the right.Questions:
1. What do you think the old man
meant that there as sometimes no difference between sleeping people and dead people?
2. Why did he disagree with Joe that choosing between the two doors was not blind chance?
3. What did he mean that the two doors represent two versions of reality?
4. How did the old man respond toJoe ’s questions: “I mean, if there
is a God, why is he so secretive? Why doesn't he just step out and introduce
himself to us?”
5. What was the point of the old man’s example of the model of the solar system?
2. Why did he disagree with Joe that choosing between the two doors was not blind chance?
3. What did he mean that the two doors represent two versions of reality?
4. How did the old man respond to
5. What was the point of the old man’s example of the model of the solar system?
1 comment:
This approach (using dialog) as a means of explaining or arguing God's existence etc., is very effective and entertaining. Good job Tim. Alias, "Foutz Genius!"
Post a Comment